In the past 6 weeks I have been examining the evidence for the reading of "shalt be" in the KJV in Revelation 16:5. Although rushed, I have compiled about 80 pages of evidence in an article on this issue that I believe is irrefutable. Below is the PDF of the article "Revelation 16:5 and the Triadic Declaration - A defense of the reading of “shalt be” in the Authorized Version."
Download PDF here
Again, I challenge James White to a debate on the topic. I know he is in Australia in the next few weeks, perhaps in Brisbane a debate could be arranged.
Again, I challenge James White to a debate on the topic. I know he is in Australia in the next few weeks, perhaps in Brisbane a debate could be arranged.
Footnote 6 should read Holland not Hollands.
ReplyDeleteThanks Daniel. Corrected.
Deleteיְהֹוָה is not a tertragrammaton. It would be most improper to transliterate it as YHWH.
ReplyDeleteיְהֹוָה is commonly described as a Tetragrammaton. How would you define it exactly?
DeleteIt's the Hebrew word transliterated into English as Jehovah, an invention of the Masoretes.
DeleteSo why are so many Israelite's names prefixed with Jeho - after Jehovah (Jehosophat, Jehoachim, etc). Why also did those who wrote scripture shorten Jeho in names to just Ho?
DeleteIt is clear that Jehovah is not just an invention of the Masoretes, as many named their Children after Him. My PDF article explains this.
PIPI is not an "attempt to preserve a form of the Tetragrammaton in palaeo-Hebrew characters". It is reading the modern Hebrew tetragrammaton as if it were the uncial Greek letters Pi Iota Pi Iota, which is in fact what it looks like.
ReplyDelete