I
expected White to be vitriolic and mocking. I have encountered White before in his forum a few years back when I
politely asked him if I could present a view about Easter that he may not have
seen before. He said it was fine for me to do so. After I posted some material
concerning Easter (see my website here), he asked me some questions about my position, as did others in the chat group. As I was answering them, White
became very annoyed and irrational and then called me a Ruckmanite (as I mention in my latest Easter Video here) and banned
me from his forum. So to see White mock those who translate the Textus Receptus / Reformation Text and scorn at the evidence revealing that "shalt be" is indeed in bibles older than Beza's, was not a shock. In stark contrast concerning Easter, world leading expert on the English language David Crystal
read the first article and said it was correct and gave some pointers on it.
Anyway, I thought I would put all of my information about Revelation 16:5 into a large study/small book which should be finished within a month, and I guarantee that White and many others who reject the reading of "shalt be" will have their boat rocked, perhaps even tipped over.
I also challenge White to a debate on the issue, Either here in Pakistan or in Australia. I also challenge him to a debate concerning Easter and the claims that it is a mistranslation in the King James Version. White and his team claim it is mistranslated here.
Stay tuned for my study on Revelation 16:5...
Nick Sayers.
Donate
I also challenge White to a debate on the issue, Either here in Pakistan or in Australia. I also challenge him to a debate concerning Easter and the claims that it is a mistranslation in the King James Version. White and his team claim it is mistranslated here.
Stay tuned for my study on Revelation 16:5...
Nick Sayers.
Donate